Bookmakers - Tennis Betting - The Good, the bad and the ugly - Betting Forum - Betting Tips - The Daily Punt
Go Back   Betting Forum - Betting Tips - The Daily Punt > Sports Betting > Tennis Betting
Register FAQ Calendar TDP Radio Gameroom [0] Mark Forums Read
Connect with Facebook

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools
Old 17-05-2007, 15:17
Wittmann 44's Avatar
Senior Member
  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1320
Gameroom cash: $500
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Bookmakers - Tennis Betting - The Good, the bad and the ugly

Thought it might be worthwhile to put a sticky up regarding bookmakers and tennis specifically. I know there is a general bookmakers forum but as tennis is a bit of a niche sport betting wise outside the Grand Slams and Masters a number of the bookmakers are poor enough in terms of markets put up, their prices and the times they put them up. There are also a number of bookmakers who are far out in front of the competition when it comes to tennis betting.

I’d also like to add generally that the more accounts you have the better even if it is to take advantage of a single standout price. Also as anyone reading this is unlikely to bet just on tennis it pays to have as many accounts as humanely possible.

If you would like to add your own experiences and anything with those I have not covered please do. Please be aware that this is for bookmakers and tennis betting specifically as opposed to general comments about bookmakers.

Finally if there is an account that you are interested in please use the affiliate link with the Daily Punt if you decide to open an account with them.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Bookmakers - Essential Accounts

Stan James

If you are serious about betting on tennis this is in my view an essential account to have. They price up almost all events and are usually first with their prices. If you see an early price on the exchange it will generally reflect a Stan James price. Prices are competitive in terms of bookmakers and customer service is good.

Pinnacle

Pinnacle’s over rounds are the smallest of any books reflected by the fact that they are often quoted to 4 decimals points. Prices are generally the best of any bookmaker for tennis. I’d rank them slightly below Stan James as for some reason they do not always put up prices for every game and their prices tend to go up after Stan James.

Bookmakers - Other Good Accounts

Ladbrokes, Hills, Paddy Power, Bet 365, Interwetten, Boylesports

I would tend to rank all these together when it comes to tennis betting. They do what they need to but their over rounds are poor when compared to Pinnacle or even Stan James. I don’t generally bet multiples when betting on tennis but when I do I find it is handy to have these accounts as between them you can usually add a bit extra to your price by shopping around amongst them. If you bet on the outright markets there can be significant variation in prices and again this is where these accounts are very useful. Much better obviously to get an 80/1 each way selection rather than a 60/1 shout by virtue of a bit of shopping around.

Exchanges – The Essential

Betfair

Betfair in my view really comes into its own in two horse races like tennis. I would go so far as to say you will not make money betting on tennis without an account with Betfair. Prices are as close to the bone as it gets especially when betting odds against. Liquidity is never a concern except on the very smallest events. Set betting prices are also the best you will get anywhere. Backing a player to win 2-1 on Betfair will usually get a price between 4.2 and 4.8. You will be very lucky to get 7/2 with a bookmaker.

Exchanges – The Possibles

WBX (World Betting Exchange)

I opened an account with these guys a few months ago. Major plus here is the 3% commission as opposed to the 5% on Betfair. Liquidity is a fraction of Betfairs but prices are competitive and I’ve made a few bets with them. I would fear that they would go the way of Betdaq and start with a 3% commission rate before heading up towards 5% after getting a client bases in. Have not had to deal with customer service yet and have not withdrawn any funds. Hopefully will develop over time into a viable alternative to Betfair but the history of the failed competitors to Betfair isn’t good.
Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2007, 16:37
Senior Member
  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 23871
Gameroom cash: $18569
Thanks: 5
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts
Re: Bookmakers - Tennis Betting - The Good, the bad and the ugly

Good stuff Witmann. I don't take as much notice of the old tennis betting as I should do as when I've taken tips off this site I've won more than I've
lost.

I'm trying to remember why I don't have a Pinnacle account
Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2007, 09:41
engineer's Avatar
On the bridle
  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2091
Gameroom cash: $1339
Thanks: 1
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Re: Bookmakers - Tennis Betting - The Good, the bad and the ugly

Yeah, in general, you can find the best odds for tennis in Betfair. I'm digging to find better ones, but I have success for few games only, mainly at Pinnacle.
10bet and Sportingodds are good, too.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2007, 01:10
bulit's Avatar
Senior Member
  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 550
Gameroom cash: $500
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Bookmakers - Tennis Betting - The Good, the bad and the ugly

I choose this thread to ask you something guys.

Why you love to bet on big odds in tennis and finding suprices?
Everybody have own betting system but for me best is few low odds and bigger stake. It's not football where neither do I don't love low odds but tennis is sport for them.I'm just interesting for that. I mean when you can find odds around @2.60- @3.00 in tennis. It's happened one time in 4 monts maybe and you must hit her in that moment.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2007, 01:17
Wittmann 44's Avatar
Senior Member
  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1320
Gameroom cash: $500
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Bookmakers - Tennis Betting - The Good, the bad and the ugly

Quote:
Everybody have own betting system but for me best is few low odds and bigger stake.
It depends on what works for you. I rarely bet below 1.40 on singles although I do use doubles with low odds.

I like betting odds against > evens. I had a 12/1 (against Gasquet) and a 9/1 (against Petrova) winner during the French Open betting against players I felt were injured which is something I try to look out for. If you make a profit it doesn't matter if you are betting short odds, long odds or a mixture of the two.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2007, 01:29
bulit's Avatar
Senior Member
  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 550
Gameroom cash: $500
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Bookmakers - Tennis Betting - The Good, the bad and the ugly

Sorry for ask.
But after that you had many odds which you didn't hit and that was cut your profit at the end.Am i right?
On the other side all players who was in first 8 ranked reach to the 1/4 finals and first 4 in ATP list were in semis. Betting on them I made very nice profit.
OK I understand everyone and this was just question. It's doesn't matter anyway.
Good luck with all your bets Wittmann I still like doubles with low odds
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2007, 07:56
Spanish punter
  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 11786
Gameroom cash: $5373
Thanks: 6
Thanked 18 Times in 15 Posts
Re: Bookmakers - Tennis Betting - The Good, the bad and the ugly

Well going purely on yesterday's matches, Bulit, Peya (1.25), Lee (1.46) and Johannsson (1.38) all lost. Then there the likes of Soderling (1.08) and Blake (1.10) who lost the first set before coming back to win, but which would've given a nice opportunity to lay them back after the first set to ensure a profit.

There are always quite a few surprise results around, it's just a question of finding them.

And on a separate note, if you're backing heavy favourites, I hope for your sake that you use a bookie that voids bets if a player retires injured?
Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2007, 12:59
Spanish punter
  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 11786
Gameroom cash: $5373
Thanks: 6
Thanked 18 Times in 15 Posts
Re: Bookmakers - Tennis Betting - The Good, the bad and the ugly

And another list of the short-priced losers yesterday:

Gasquet 1.05
Nalbandian 1.06
Castano 1.37
Henman 1.22

If you manage to make profit from backing short-priced players then fair enough, but it only needs one loser at a price like Gasquet or Nalbandian to undo a lot of previous hard work.
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 18:51
Senior Member
  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1300
Gameroom cash: $500
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Bookmakers - Tennis Betting - The Good, the bad and the ugly

This list is a couple of years old and might need updating but this is the work of Frankie P , who puts a lot of tennis work in at oddsnet.com and for that he has kudos..

Bookie Tennis Rules
RESULT STANDS AFTER ONE BALL:
Betandwin, Betdaq, Betdirect, Betoddoreven, Betonbet, BlueSquare, Eurobet, Expect, GGbet, Globet, Interwetten, Ladbrokes, Parbet, Playit, Sportingoptions, Totebetexpress.

RESULTS STANDS AFTER ONE SET:
Betfair, Skybet, Sportingbet, Sportingodds, Stan James, Unibet.

MATCH MUST BE COMPLETED:
Admiralbet, Bet365, Betinternet, Canbet, Capitalsports, Cashpoint, Centrebet, Gamebookers, Nordicbet, Olympic, Paddy Power, Pinnacle, Stanleybet, Totalbet, Ukbetting, Victor Chandler, Vikingbet, Wetten-Schwchat, William Hill.
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 12:59
Junior Member
  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 12
Gameroom cash: $530
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Bookmakers - Tennis Betting - The Good, the bad and the ugly

Why does Betfair seem to have a stranglehold? Is it just because of the volume? The interface? As many have pointed out, it's certainly not the commission structure. I can name several that do better - pinnacle, wbx, betliner, betdaq....and the list goes on.
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 13:03
kompressaur's Avatar
Analogue Smoker
  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 86329
Gameroom cash: $8234
Thanks: 15
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Re: Bookmakers - Tennis Betting - The Good, the bad and the ugly

Hello and welcome ezmoney. I think their discussing this a bit more here
http://thedailypunt.com/forum/genera...ds-got-me.html
Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2010, 13:34
Junior Member
  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 20
Gameroom cash: $500
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Bookmakers - Tennis Betting - The Good, the bad and the ugly

Quote:
Originally Posted by ONEDUNME View Post
Good stuff Witmann. I don't take as much notice of the old tennis betting as I should do as when I've taken tips off this site I've won more than I've
lost.

I'm trying to remember why I don't have a Pinnacle account
They are good in my opinion. I don't like bet365 though. They're pathetic for winners :D
Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-2010, 23:17
Member
  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 46
Gameroom cash: $825
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Bookmakers - Tennis Betting - The Good, the bad and the ugly

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wittmann 44 View Post
Thought it might be worthwhile to put a sticky up regarding bookmakers and tennis specifically. I know there is a general bookmakers forum but as tennis is a bit of a niche sport betting wise outside the Grand Slams and Masters a number of the bookmakers are poor enough in terms of markets put up, their prices and the times they put them up. There are also a number of bookmakers who are far out in front of the competition when it comes to tennis betting.

I’d also like to add generally that the more accounts you have the better even if it is to take advantage of a single standout price. Also as anyone reading this is unlikely to bet just on tennis it pays to have as many accounts as humanely possible.

If you would like to add your own experiences and anything with those I have not covered please do. Please be aware that this is for bookmakers and tennis betting specifically as opposed to general comments about bookmakers.

Finally if there is an account that you are interested in please use the affiliate link with the Daily Punt if you decide to open an account with them.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Bookmakers - Essential Accounts

Stan James

If you are serious about betting on tennis this is in my view an essential account to have. They price up almost all events and are usually first with their prices. If you see an early price on the exchange it will generally reflect a Stan James price. Prices are competitive in terms of bookmakers and customer service is good.

Pinnacle

Pinnacle’s over rounds are the smallest of any books reflected by the fact that they are often quoted to 4 decimals points. Prices are generally the best of any bookmaker for tennis. I’d rank them slightly below Stan James as for some reason they do not always put up prices for every game and their prices tend to go up after Stan James.

Bookmakers - Other Good Accounts

Ladbrokes, Hills, Paddy Power, Bet 365, Interwetten, Boylesports

I would tend to rank all these together when it comes to tennis betting. They do what they need to but their over rounds are poor when compared to Pinnacle or even Stan James. I don’t generally bet multiples when betting on tennis but when I do I find it is handy to have these accounts as between them you can usually add a bit extra to your price by shopping around amongst them. If you bet on the outright markets there can be significant variation in prices and again this is where these accounts are very useful. Much better obviously to get an 80/1 each way selection rather than a 60/1 shout by virtue of a bit of shopping around.

Exchanges – The Essential

Betfair

Betfair in my view really comes into its own in two horse races like tennis. I would go so far as to say you will not make money betting on tennis without an account with Betfair. Prices are as close to the bone as it gets especially when betting odds against. Liquidity is never a concern except on the very smallest events. Set betting prices are also the best you will get anywhere. Backing a player to win 2-1 on Betfair will usually get a price between 4.2 and 4.8. You will be very lucky to get 7/2 with a bookmaker.

Exchanges – The Possibles

WBX (World Betting Exchange)

I opened an account with these guys a few months ago. Major plus here is the 3% commission as opposed to the 5% on Betfair. Liquidity is a fraction of Betfairs but prices are competitive and I’ve made a few bets with them. I would fear that they would go the way of Betdaq and start with a 3% commission rate before heading up towards 5% after getting a client bases in. Have not had to deal with customer service yet and have not withdrawn any funds. Hopefully will develop over time into a viable alternative to Betfair but the history of the failed competitors to Betfair isn’t good.
Nice job, Wittmann. I am planning to make my first bet at the Roland Garros, and I think your reviews about the bookmakers will be very useful. So, the one you strongest reccomend is Stan James, right? . I don't want to make a fortune of it, I would only like ( for the beginning) to gain a symbolic amount of money. And, of course, once I made a bet, a would surely watch the tennis match with a potentially grown attention and excitement. fficeffice" />DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\msohtml1\01\cli p_image001.gif">

Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2010, 12:23
engineer's Avatar
On the bridle
  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2091
Gameroom cash: $1339
Thanks: 1
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Re: Bookmakers - Tennis Betting - The Good, the bad and the ugly

Minoto, pay attention that Wittmann's post is dated more than 3 years back, so some of the things may not be the same
Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2010, 12:47
mord's Avatar
Crazy Czech
  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1960
Gameroom cash: $1509
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Re: Bookmakers - Tennis Betting - The Good, the bad and the ugly

I´m trying a small treble today

Gasquet
Verdasco
Gil

all of them should be too much for their opponents and I saw Klizan (Gils opponent) and he was just awful, 10 double faults, etc.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.thedailypunt.com/forum/tennis-betting/102617-bookmakers-tennis-betting-good-bad-ugly.html
Posted By For Type Date
Tennis Betting - Betting Forum - Betting Tips - The Daily Punt This thread Refback 17-09-2009 16:52

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBulletin Copyright © 2010 vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2