Martingale mutations

[kamacho]

Hello! Most people think that the betting progressions are based only on double betting at a minimum coefficient 2: 1 - 2 - 4 - 8 - 16 - 32 - 64 ....
The truth is that there are 4 dynamic parameters that can determine the final net profit of the betting progression: type of the net profit (fixed, progesive, regressive, etc.), base amount( bank ), steps and minimal coefficient for each step. We have to win only one step and then we could start some new system.

Example 1 - Fixed net profit, bank = 100, 3 steps and minimum coefficient of each step = 2. In this case we win static value = 14.29:
'Step', 'Losses', 'Bet', 'Net profit', 'Gross profit';
1, 14.29, 14.29, 14.29, 28.57;
2, 42.86, 28.57, 14.29, 57.14;
3, 100.0, 57.14, 14.29, 114.29;

Example 2 - the same system but with a progressive net profit. In this case we add 9.09 net profit on each step:
'Step', 'Losses', 'Bet', 'Net profit', 'Gross profit';
1, 9.09, 9.09, 9.09, 18.18;
2, 36.36, 27.27, 18.18, 54.55;
3, 100.0, 63.64, 27.27, 127.27;

[ONEDUNME]

Martingale is shit and anybody who uses it is a fucking idiot but welcome to TDP.

[kamacho]

Hello. This is risky system, but the using of the full bank amount is not obligatory! For example if you have bank 1000 EUR, you could use only part of the amount for some progressive system, for example 100 EUR.

[ONEDUNME]

I take it you are going to be using it in live betting on this thread and not just the theory mate.

I'll be interested to see how it goes.

[kamacho]

From mathematical point each single bet is a particular case of progressive system with 1 step( Example3 ). So each other betting system could be described by list of progressive systems.

Example1:
3 steps(coefficient 3), bank = 100:
Step Sum of bets(losses) Bet Net profit Gross profit
1 21.05 21.05 42.11 63.16
2 52.63 31.58 42.11 94.74
3 100.0 47.37 42.11 142.11

Example2:
2 steps(coefficient 3), bank = 100:
Step Sum of bets(losses) Bet Net profit Gross profit
1 40.0 40.0 80.0 120.0
2 100.0 60.0 80.0 180.0

Example3:
1 step(coefficient 3), bank = 100:
Step Sum of bets(losses) Bet Net profit Gross profit
1 100.0 100.0 200.0 300.0

[ONEDUNME]

All staking systems look great until you hit the losing run.

Unless your selection system is good, staking systems are a waste of time. As much as one may like to delude oneself that there is some kind of magical formula to bail you out, the fact is that if you can't win with level stakes then you can't win and you should either be just gambling for fun or you should pack in altogether.

Of course, the third option is to pay some scamming bastard for a secret formula to help you. At least that means that one of you will retire with a profit.

[JustinK]

Originally Posted by ONEDUNME

Martingale is shit and anybody who uses it is a fucking idiot but welcome to TDP.

Agree, martingale is the way to go bankrupt, if you have a winning stake, go away and never look back to it 'cause you'll loose it all in the end. Money is not unlimited.