Solo's Simple System

[Napoleon Solo]

I'm testing a very simple betting system which has done alright over the last few days, especially today with 5 correct picks out of 5 (even though I did aftertime them in the Weekend Bets thread).

Ignoring the results so far, tomorrows picks will follow shortly....

[traeth]

Originally Posted by Napoleon Solo

I'm testing a very simple betting system which has done alright over the last few days, especially today with 5 correct picks out of 5 (even though I did aftertime them in the Weekend Bets thread).

Ignoring the results so far, tomorrows picks will follow shortly....

saw your great results , how simple is the system?

[Napoleon Solo]

Originally Posted by traeth

saw your great results , how simple is the system?

Very....

[traeth]

Originally Posted by Napoleon Solo

Very....

are you going to let us know how it works?

[Napoleon Solo]

No!

Can't let the bookies know, Traeth......

[Napoleon Solo]

Taken a while, but finally....

12:00 Atletico Arona v Tegueste 3.15
13:00 Agrotikos Asteras v Ethnikos Asteras 1.90
13:30 Foggia v Venezia 2.10
13:30 Groningen v AZ Alkmaar 2.00
14:00 Genoa v Sampdoria 2.85
14:00 Nice 2 v Toulouse 2 1.90
15:15 Numancia B v At.Bembibre 2.60
15:30 Atletico Deva v Ribamontan Mar 1.85
15:30 Crevillente v Eldense 1.97
15:30 Aluvion v Chantrea 1.75
16:00 Almeria v Real Murcia 1.85

There are plenty of other selections, but all are at odds of 1.65 or less. I've just stayed with the higher odds selections.

For the purposes of the system, they'll all be covered to level stake, but I've personally invested in various trebles bets.

[Napoleon Solo]

Completely overlooked the first game of the day that was chosen by the system.

Viktoria Zizkov v SK Kladno 1.75 (currently 1-0)

[Napoleon Solo]

12:00 Atletico Arona v Tegueste 3.15 Drew 2-2 - 5 points
13:00 Agrotikos Asteras v Ethnikos Asteras 1.90 Lost 1-2 - 5 points
13:30 Foggia v Venezia 2.10 Won 1-0 + 5.50 points
13:30 Groningen v AZ Alkmaar 2.00 Won 2-1 + 5 points
14:00 Genoa v Sampdoria 2.85 Lost 0-1 - 5 points
14:00 Nice 2 v Toulouse 2 1.90 Drew 1-1 - 5 points
15:15 Numancia B v At.Bembibre 2.60 Drew 1-1 - 5 points
15:30 Atletico Deva v Ribamontan Mar 1.85 Lost 0-2 - 5 points
15:30 Crevillente v Eldense 1.97 Drew 1-1 - 5 points
15:30 Aluvion v Chantrea 1.75 Won 2-0 + 3.75 points
16:00 Almeria v Real Murcia 1.85 Won 1-0 + 4.25 points


Staked: 11 points
Returns: 7.70 points
Profit/Loss: -3.30 points

Not a great start. Will carry on however!

[skinnyman9000]

So what is this system? Apart from choosing random games? Surely you need to explain the system rather than just results? Results from an unknown test are not very useful.....

[rcgills]

Originally Posted by skinnyman9000

So what is this system? Apart from choosing random games? Surely you need to explain the system rather than just results? Results from an unknown test are not very useful.....

Why does he need to explain it Skinnyman? If someone thinks they've found a system that works, why would they tell everyone how it works/what it's based on?

The System Proofing section is here for exactly that - proofing systems. As long as the picks are posted before the games are played, there's no problem. After a few weeks, if Napoleon's results are so good that people decide they want to follow his system "blindly", great, that's up to them. If they decide that they'd rather not on the basis that they don't know how the system works, that's fine. Everyone's free to choose, but there's no obligation at all for people to provide information on how their system works.

[Napoleon Solo]

Not had much chance this week, been busy!

Be back next week sometime!

[skinnyman9000]

Originally Posted by rcgills

Why does he need to explain it Skinnyman? If someone thinks they've found a system that works, why would they tell everyone how it works/what it's based on?

The System Proofing section is here for exactly that - proofing systems. As long as the picks are posted before the games are played, there's no problem. After a few weeks, if Napoleon's results are so good that people decide they want to follow his system "blindly", great, that's up to them. If they decide that they'd rather not on the basis that they don't know how the system works, that's fine. Everyone's free to choose, but there's no obligation at all for people to provide information on how their system works.

Chill winston