Strictly Come Dancing 2010

[Beanie]

It was an interesting one Stereo.

Just before the first freeze, there was a huge gamble on Pamela(down to sub 3.00, she started the night at 13.00!!) Matt was the outsider of the 3 at 3.40, Kara fairly solid around 2.60. 2 minutes later Pamela goes out...

Then after lines open again, Matt starts at 2.2 and slides all the way out to 4.0 by the time the vote is suspended.

TBH i doubt it was insiders...merely punters reacting to what the judges were saying, borne out by the massive gamble on Pamela just because the judges were tripping over themselves to get her to the top of the leaderboard.

[yorkieacermark2000]

Drat so much for insiders I should stop betting on this stupid tv shows

[Beanie]

Aye apologies yorkie - the evidence does suggest that the info was wrong - its v unlikely(tho not impossible) for such a margin to be overturned from a semi to a final.

It appears to have been given in good faith, whether it was the same when given to him, who knows.

Now puts a big ? beside 2 of the few remaining supposedly solid sources...

[Rob44]

wtf! didn't bother watching as so certain matt would win! glad i wasn't on him big time but irritating loss just the same

[yorkieacermark2000]

Im going to go and look on Betfair and see if the poster has put up any reasoning to as why he didnt win

[Beanie]

He doesnt have to yorkie, the info was given in good faith(it was posted on the thread of an ill member struggling for money so I'd seriously doubt it was deliberately wrong.)

Either passed on to him wrong, or was correct and Kara overturned the deficit in the final, which given the way it went is defintely possible.