Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2007, 21:17
FC Basher's Avatar
Bentley Owner
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2331
Re: An Exercise in Hand Reading

Surely any good player would have bet on the flop if had anything,checking your giving players free cards,and to check on the turn well if he aint got quads now he could get suckered by the river.He aint got more than 2 pair in my book.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2007, 21:17
Scottieboy08's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 987
Re: An Exercise in Hand Reading

No probs Chris
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2007, 21:20
Doc's Avatar
Doc Doc jest offline
TBA
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1036
Re: An Exercise in Hand Reading

KK possible but I don't like it. For one, there are 3 times as many ways for him to have JJ as KK - so way more likely. Secondly - he has the deck absolutely crippled. There is no point in checking it twice. He has to hope that someone has a jack or even better 22 and is going to play with him
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2007, 21:30
christianu's Avatar
Busto noobs
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5420
Re: An Exercise in Hand Reading

Yeah but they dont think about it like that, if they have quads there checking/calling to the river, thats most players anyway. I was watching a poker programme the other week to emphasise this "hand to big to bet" brigade.

Somebody had A9c and called a raise

flop 9s 9d Jc

He checks and other guy bets and he calls

Turn is Qc

So now board is 99JQ with him having A9 and the nut flush draw.

He puts out a bet and the commentator says...." I think he has too big a hand to bet"

I immediately switched programmes because I must have forgot poker commentators annoy me more than anything thats every annoyed me.

Anyway.. Yeah pretty much spot on should be JJ or KK with jacks probably more likely as you cant really put someone on quads can you?
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2007, 21:32
christianu's Avatar
Busto noobs
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5420
Re: An Exercise in Hand Reading

Sorry doc btw for what i said in the other thread, i havent looked at it since because of embarrasment, out of order.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2007, 21:35
wazik's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 616
Re: An Exercise in Hand Reading

I think its KK or JJ (more likely) because they are the only hands he can have that he plays it like that on the flop.

On that flop with AA, AK, AJ (prolly) your betting. He doesnt have AQ (you would hope).

If he has JJ then all he is worried about is KK so he checks hoping someone with AK or AA bets into him on the turn, plan changes when the K hits and its now more unlikely someone is holding KK.

I would have played JJ differently than he has but in that position on the turn you could make an argument for checking and hoping a A or another K doesnt hit. When it doesnt he thinks hes getting paid against AK.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2007, 21:52
Late Punter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1011
Re: An Exercise in Hand Reading

I'll have a go at answering this.

My gut instinct was KK and now I'm looking for evidence of this.

So I'm Dormouse on the button with KK and I'm thinking :drums

There are three limpers prior to me so I am thinking they must have either pocket pairs or suited connectors. Any stronger hands would raise here. ( I am of course assuming all players are good due to their chip stacks here).
So it comes round to me on the button with KK and there is $4 in the pot so I raise - how much - with three limpers - and I must have the best hand. I don't want to scare them away and I am not scared of an Ace so $5 seems about right.

Two callers - they must both have pairs and are hoping to hit their sets - who else would just call.

So down comes the flop and bingo bango bongo I have got top set. I have put the other two players on (low) pocket pairs so any bet here would scare them off. The flop is rainbow (not that I put them on suited connectors anyway) and KJ2. Best to check and hope someone hits their set and leads into me.

Turn - wow - another K - if someone hits their set here then its payday - but any other pair here will fold if I bet so check.

River - first person to act bets the pot so he must have 33 and has made his boat(he also has a smaller than buy in stack so maybe he is not a good player) so what size bet can I make to guarantee a call. If I go all in it may be too big so about 1.5 times the pot seems about right.


Thats me just thinking aloud anyway. Dormouse we have to assume is a good player and a hand like JJ or AK would bet earlier.
KK for me
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2007, 21:57
Doc's Avatar
Doc Doc jest offline
TBA
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1036
Re: An Exercise in Hand Reading

no problem chris. I learned long ago not to take things to heart on here
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2007, 22:10
mrmuzeman's Avatar
VAMOS!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9888
Re: An Exercise in Hand Reading

Im not gona go into much detail cos its already been covered good tbh but JJ is the most likely holding. KK was looking good as well until the turn (could easily still be). AK is a possibility. He doesnt have any other hand bar those, apart from some minor amount of time with a freaky thing or weird bluff that you cant worry about.

You are actually getting bang on 2/1 for your money so I couldnt blame anyone for calling...it could be AK. But for my money he will bet AK a lot of the time on the flop wheras KK or JJ will be checked looooooads of the time on that flop by players. Id fold anyway cos my instinct tells me im beat by JJ but if it were 3/1 odds I call incase of AK.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2007, 22:21
Beanie's Avatar
Bullshiner
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 10452
Re: An Exercise in Hand Reading

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colbro
(he also has a smaller than buy in stack so maybe he is not a good player)
That looks like a 100% correct read to me Colbro!

Looking at it I can't disagree with the KK (and also JJ - as mentioned it is fairly likely both will be played in the same way here) read so if I'm being honest that would have been my answer.

However, the way you've worded your post suggests this wasn't the case Jez...unless you folded to one of the above hands and he gave you a free look to an annoying chorus of 'nh's from the table.

I'm not entirely sure what else it can be - depending on his image of you and vice versa he could be looking to bluff here...from the preflop action he isn't putting you on JJ or KK, and from the flop he won't be believing you for a K - anything less you'll fold to a reraise on the river anyway(barring the small pocket pairs of course.)

If he knows he's got your respect, and knows you'll notice the way he's played it this is a decent spot to bluff - he knows the only hand you'll call a reraise with is 33, and for all the small pocket pairs you might have the reraise at that pot is a calculated move.

77, 88, 99, 10 10 I think he bets at the flop, so the only hand I'm left with is:

AQ

(I'm still in the KK/JJ camp, but if forced to think outside the box I'll go for the above.)
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2007, 22:22
DAN DAN's owner
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2560
Re: An Exercise in Hand Reading

Wow loads of great replies in such a short space of time guys.

As soon as I got raised on that river I very quickly went to go all in. Then I stopped for a split second and went to call instead. Then I suddenly realised hang on a sec, think about this. (NL tables were extremely new on hills at this time, I think we were on 60second timers ).

I went back and thought through various hands he could have. He raised preflop when he was clearly going to get called by a few limpers, this probably means AQ/AK or a big pair. The flop came down KJ2 rainbow. AK or AA are possibilities for him preflop. However he bets these hands on the flop, almost without question. So I discounted these. On the turn the K pairs and he checks again. I think here he PROBABLY bets QQ (not sure, he might still check to play safe) he still checks TT tho. If he had AQ then if he was going to try and steal it it would have been on the flop (although unlikely as there was 3 of us in), but he probably would have checked. However he could have flopped either a set of kings or jacks on the flop. This is very much the sort of thing he would check as well, hoping someone catches up with him. By now on the turn he would either have jacks full or 4 kings. The four kings is a lot less likely for obvious reasons, but it is a definate, slim, possibility. On the river I fill up and lead at the pot. He raises. If we go back though his hand range, what would he do it with? Yes he would raise with AK but we can discount that as he would have bet the flop with it. He folds TT probably pretty much all the time, perhaps he calls if he is a total idiot. With QQ he certainly does not raise. He probably calls but he does not raise thats for sure. If he was going to steal with AQ it would have been by trying a bet on the flop and not by raising on the river. Therefore the only hands he can possibly have are, the most likely, Jacks full with JJ or the slim chance of four kings. This took me the full 60seconds to comprehend and I really couldnt believe I was about to fold a full house using both my hole cards. It was the first time I had ever made such a fold and let me tell you it was AGONISING at the time. After I "tanked" for the full period I typed what I was folding into the chat box. Such was my agony at making this fold, however correct I had worked it out to be, I knew I was going to have nightmares about it forever more . I folded and he showed. Jacks full. I almost lept out my chair in delight lol. It was a real revelation at the time to me and it opened a whole dimension of poker to me.

You all gave excellent answers here, I am impressed. I sure had much more of a struggle coming to terms with all this when I was actually playing this hand than many of you obviously did. Dont be disheartened if you got it wrong, there is not a single poker player in the world who can get it right even 80% of the time. Im going to continue this thread and post some more hands up if you lot think its a good idea.

Jez.

P.S Some of you mentioned AJ as a possible hand. I have to admit at the time my thought process did not include this hand in his range, I only thought about what I typed above at the time. However now you say this I agree it is reasonable to think he could have AJ at some points during this hand. However he would not raise on the river with it, he would just call (and it probably bets the turn also)
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2007, 22:23
DAN DAN's owner
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2560
Re: An Exercise in Hand Reading

lol Colbro

I have a defence plea about my stack size lol. Back then hills only let you reload if you were below 60 dollars on 100NL...! I swear!

(I hope )

Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2007, 22:31
Late Punter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1011
Re: An Exercise in Hand Reading

Quote:
lol Colbro

I have a defence plea about my stack size lol. Back then hills only let you reload if you were below 60 dollars on 100NL...! I swear!

(I hope )

I did cover myself Jez by saying I was looking at it from Dormouse point of view - not mine.

Lol
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2007, 22:37
Late Punter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1011
Re: An Exercise in Hand Reading

Ok - A serious question here for the good players.

In the same position would you raise $5 into a $4 pot in dormouse position with JJ. That to me seems a stange bet?

(I must also add here I hate JJ with a passion)
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 13-02-2007, 22:43
mrmuzeman's Avatar
VAMOS!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9888
Re: An Exercise in Hand Reading

I and other have typed up some good stuff on how we like to play JJ in full ring cash games mate. Itll be down in the poker page depths somewhere. The short answer is no id limp along.

Quote:
You all gave excellent answers here, I am impressed. I sure had much more of a struggle coming to terms with all this when I was actually playing this hand than many of you obviously did.
Not that I want to piss on anyones bonfire or anything but the fact you flagged the hand up for special analysing for this thread simply makes people look at the hand more than they probably would do if they were actually playing. Hopefully you see what I mean
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

TDP Betting Forum News

Betting Forums

Weekly Prize Competition
paddy power

'Place your Bets' & win a £20 Free Bet each week.See HERE for more details.


Football Links

Soccernet Previews

Skysports

Deposit

Latest Sports Streams

Free Bets

Poker Rooms (Busiest)

Paddy



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:13.